Once you learn how to use the definition of a sequence limit to prove that a sequence converges to a limit, the next step is to develop a set of tools that you can use so that way you can solve more challenging problems, without having to do a proof by definition every time. Some of these tools are the Squeeze Theorem and the Monotone Convergence Theorem. Today, we will add another tool to our tool kit: the ratio test.
The Ratio Test for Sequences
The Ratio Test for Sequences: Let be a sequence where
for all
and whose ratio has the limit,
Then, we have the following implications.
- If
then
- If
then
diverges (unbounded).
- If
then ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Proof Prolegomenon: Vocabulary aside, prolegomenon is like a prologue to a book, but it is used in more scholarly work in order to set the stage for more detailed analysis later on. And I suppose that this is somewhat scholarly, but most importantly, it’s a really fun word to say! Try it! Basically, we are going to give an outline for the following proof.
We have three parts to prove! How wonderful is that? For part 1, the key idea is to rely on the squeeze theorem to prove But, in order to do so, we must find another two sequences to sandwich
between! Our lower bound sequence will be the constant sequence
and our upper bound sequence will be a geometric sequence made from some
We will show (Lemma 1) that choosing
leads to
which for a certain value of
will be our geometric sequence. These together prove that
Lemma 1: Let and
Then, the geometric sequence
converges to zero.
Proof: We will use the monotone convergence theorem (love this theorem). If it happens to be the case that then
for all
Which makes it clear that
likewise when
For these reasons, assume
and consider the case where
Observe that
is monotone decreasing and bounded below. These follow from the fact that
implies
and the assumption that both
and
are non-negative imply that
is bounded below by 0. Therefore, by the monotone convergence theorem we deduce the following,
,
,
,
Where we used some limit laws that are intuitive, but we have yet to prove. We will prove these next time, but until then you can try to prove them yourself! Using the last two bullet points we end up with the algebraic equation which becomes
Since we assumed
it must be that
The case where is similar. Give it a go! You can do it!
We are not done yet; we will need one more result. We want to be able to use to conclude that
Better yet, we can prove the stronger statement given in Lemma 2.
Lemma 2:
Proof:
Forward:
Let and
By the definition of a limit, we know there is some
such that,
for all Using this same
we have the similar inequality,
proving
Backward:
Give it a go!
In part 2, we will use a very similar argument in order to compare to a divergent geometric series,
when
Part 3, stary tuned!
Proof of Ratio Test:
(1) Let Can you see why it must be the case that
Choose some
and let
Since
by the definition of a limit we know that there is some
such that,
for all . Or, better yet,
and therefore
Now we will employ the trick were we multiply by a fancy looking 1. In this case, we will multiply by
where we have
. This gives,
Since we are assuming , each fraction is less than
. I.e.,
Thus,
We can now use the squeeze theorem, because (for all
) and by lemma 1 the sequence
Thus, by the squeeze theorem (nuanced) (see footnote),1
Finally, by Lemma 2, is equivalent to
Just like that, we’re done… part 1.
(2) Let We aim to show that
diverges and we do so by proving that
is unbounded. With this goal in mind, we will use a similar argument to the one used in part 1. First, note there is some
such that
and furthermore let
there is some
such that,
for all . Or, better yet,
therefore for all
. Again, multiply by a fancy looking 1 we get,
But this time we end up with,
And since (I leave that for you to prove, you’re welcome) we conclude
is unbounded and hence
diverges.
(3) Take a look at the sequences: and
They both have
but the former converges and the later doesn’t. This means that the ratio test is absolutely useless when
Let’s Use the Ratio Test
We will end with a quick application of the ratio test. We will prove the following limit:
Proof: Ironically, we will be using the root test and the definition of the limit. To this end, let and consider the sequence
Using the ratio test,
Thus, Therefore, there exists a
such that,
for all Hence,
for all Which, by the defininton of limit implies
Concluding Remarks
The ratio test is a very useful tool in analysis. We will see it again when we start to work with infinite series. But until then let’s get some practice with the ratio test. See what you can say regarding the following sequences:
With that done, I hope you had some fun and learned something new!
Be Kind. Be Curious. Be Compassionate. Be Creative.
And Have Fun!
Footnote:
- Theorem (The Squeeze Theorem (Nuanced)): Let
,andbe three sequences such thatfor allwhereIfandthenas well. ↩︎

Leave a comment